Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Gabriel Beddingfield <gabrbedd@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 - 2:36 pm

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Gabriel Beddingfield
wrote:

>> i don't see why this is needed. its trivial to demonstrate on a piece

funny, but just so that we're clear - I'm not suggesting that a paper
proof of correctness is enough, but I am suggesting that a paper proof
of incorrectness *is* enough.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?, Tim Blechmann, (Wed Jul 13, 9:09 am)
Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?, Olivier Guilyardi, (Wed Jul 13, 1:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?, Paul Davis, (Wed Jul 13, 1:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?, Gabriel Beddingfield, (Wed Jul 13, 2:28 pm)
Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?, Paul Davis, (Wed Jul 13, 2:36 pm)
Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?, Olivier Guilyardi, (Wed Jul 13, 2:27 pm)