linuxaudio.org

On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:43:53 +0200

rosea grammostola  wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 06:33 PM, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:

quoted text
> > 2011/7/10 rosea grammostola:

> >> On 07/03/2011 12:27 AM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

> >>>

> >>> As to Jack Session support, I won't even consider it as long

> >>> as it doesn't support quit-without-save.

> >>> The rationale for not supporting this is IMNSHO completely bogus.

> > After playing around with it, I'm with you here. It should have

> > quit-without-save and a few more improvements.

> >

> >>> I've got some other gripes with

> >>> Jack Session as well, but these have been discussed (or at least

> >>> presented) before.

> >>>

> > Looks like I missed that discussion.

> > I think Torben Hohn did very well, introducing jack-session,

> > it's the way to go, but I think too, it's not mature.

> >

> > I've prepared a proposal that tries to improve some parts of

> > jack-session, without making it much more complicated.

> > Everyone is welcome, to add his ideas and opinion.

> >

> > http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/wiki/user/emrum/jack_session_2_draft

> Good job. I added some comments.

> 

just wanted to notify that one of the "additional ideas" is asking

support for multiple sessions, while one of Emanuel's

"conclusions" (first bulleted list, third item) says that this is now

possible but should actually not be, as it could be an error-source.
cheers

renato

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev