Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Folderol <folderol@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, June 9, 2011 - 10:37 pm

On 9 June 2011 23:30, Folderol wrote:

But are the two really so different? They both do exactly the same
thing except one does it with synthesised waveforms and the other does
it with sampled waveforms. From thinking about the fact that most soft
synths use wave-tables, it can't be that difficult to put a sample in
there? Aside from synthesised waveform and sampled waveform, I think
(but don't quote me on this :-) that it is perhaps only certain
conventions which distinguish the two.

James.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, James Morris, (Thu Jun 9, 10:23 pm)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Jaromír Mikeš, (Sun Jun 12, 11:45 am)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Devin Anderson, (Fri Jun 10, 1:52 am)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, James Morris, (Fri Jun 10, 2:27 am)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Jun 10, 10:15 am)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Folderol, (Thu Jun 9, 10:30 pm)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Jun 9, 11:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, James Morris, (Thu Jun 9, 10:37 pm)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Jun 10, 10:22 am)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Folderol, (Fri Jun 10, 7:21 pm)