[LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linux Audio Developers <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, June 9, 2011 - 10:23 pm

Hi,

Since working on Petri-Foo I keep returning to the idea that perhaps
it would be better to add a sampler-waveform to Yoshimi or another
soft-synth. Too bad I'm not that great a coder.

Anyway, the idea seems so obvious now. Are there any good reasons for why not?

Just an idea I wanted to put out.

James.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, James Morris, (Thu Jun 9, 10:23 pm)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Jaromír Mikeš, (Sun Jun 12, 11:45 am)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Devin Anderson, (Fri Jun 10, 1:52 am)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, James Morris, (Fri Jun 10, 2:27 am)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Jun 10, 10:15 am)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Folderol, (Thu Jun 9, 10:30 pm)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Ralf Mardorf, (Thu Jun 9, 11:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, James Morris, (Thu Jun 9, 10:37 pm)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Jun 10, 10:22 am)
Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?, Folderol, (Fri Jun 10, 7:21 pm)