[LAD] jack routing vs pulse routing

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linux Audio Developers <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Saturday, April 23, 2011 - 10:25 am

I'm familiar with JACK but not at all with Pulse, but while doing a
little research to sum up various Linux audio APIs on a user group
list I keep seeing claims* that at first sight suggest Pulse is
capable of doing the audio routing with low latency that we know and
love JACK for doing.

Can someone sum up the differences between JACK and Pulse in this regard?

James.

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse_audio#Features
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] jack routing vs pulse routing, James Morris, (Sat Apr 23, 10:25 am)
Re: [LAD] jack routing vs pulse routing, Paul Davis, (Sat Apr 23, 3:15 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack routing vs pulse routing, James Morris, (Sat Apr 23, 6:04 pm)