Re: [LAD] engine, validation, ui separation,

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Friday, March 4, 2011 - 11:53 am

--nextPart3413332.6NkPMqbyTA
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Friday 04 March 2011 12:30:13 James Morris wrote:

The engine doesn't have to do the validation in the realtime-processing=20
thread. Just check for the limits where the values enter the engine. This c=
an=20
easily done when using functions to set the values and thus hiding the=20
internal queues (to get the new values to the realtime-engine without block=
ing=20
either side).

> But if multiple UIs are possible, validation effort is duplicated.

Well, checking the limits once to many doesn't crash the engine. Not checki=
ng=20
the limits might...

Have fun,

Arnold

--nextPart3413332.6NkPMqbyTA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk1w0scACgkQuYLL1cDjHx3AlgCfaXB6+MEf2r/IFnzB6WFlCK9Q
FfEAmwUw/R2rmmH8nI2roV4F7mvKa5p0
=HJez
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3413332.6NkPMqbyTA--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] engine, validation, ui separation,, James Morris, (Fri Mar 4, 11:30 am)
Re: [LAD] engine, validation, ui separation,, David Robillard, (Fri Mar 4, 6:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] engine, validation, ui separation,, Stefano D'Angelo, (Fri Mar 4, 11:54 am)
Re: [LAD] engine, validation, ui separation,, Arnold Krille, (Fri Mar 4, 11:53 am)
Re: [LAD] engine, validation, ui separation,, Paul Davis, (Fri Mar 4, 11:33 am)
Re: [LAD] engine, validation, ui separation,, James Morris, (Fri Mar 4, 11:53 am)
Re: [LAD] engine, validation, ui separation,, David Robillard, (Fri Mar 4, 7:17 pm)