Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: Linux Audio Developers <linux-audio-dev@...>

Subject: Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback

Date: Saturday, March 26, 2011 - 11:36 pm

On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:40:03PM -0400, Paul Coccoli wrote:

quoted text

> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Lieven Moors wrote:
> > My question is, if it would be acceptable to use the sync callback
> > to do this, because strictly speaking, my client wouldn't be a
> > slow sync client.
>
> I probably don't fully understand the problem, but I would expect an
> arpeggiator to make use of the tempo and BBT info in the jack
> transport state struct (I forget all the actual structure/field names)
> so that the arpeggios are played in sync with other clients.

Yes, that's the piece my program is missing.
Until now I've been generating the BBT info
(or part of it) within the program itself,
but without being a good slave, and without
having a timebase callback.

I'll have to figure this out...

Thanks for the reply,

lievenmoors
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Lieven Moors, (Sat Mar 26, 3:08 pm)

Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Paul Coccoli, (Sat Mar 26, 8:40 pm)

Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Lieven Moors, (Sat Mar 26, 11:36 pm)

Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Paul Davis, (Sat Mar 26, 3:18 pm)

Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Lieven Moors, (Sat Mar 26, 3:46 pm)

Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, torbenh, (Sat Mar 26, 6:50 pm)

Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Lieven Moors, (Sat Mar 26, 11:23 pm)

Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Paul Davis, (Sat Mar 26, 9:02 pm)