Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Lieven Moors <lievenmoors@...>
Cc: Linux Audio Developers <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Saturday, March 26, 2011 - 6:50 pm

On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:45:51PM +0100, Lieven Moors wrote:

using the sync callback to detect a skip in the transport is
not adequate usage of it.
an arpegiator is NOT a slow sync client. so... do not use the sync_cb !!!!

>

--
torben Hohn
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Lieven Moors, (Sat Mar 26, 3:08 pm)
Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Paul Coccoli, (Sat Mar 26, 8:40 pm)
Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Lieven Moors, (Sat Mar 26, 11:36 pm)
Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Paul Davis, (Sat Mar 26, 3:18 pm)
Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Lieven Moors, (Sat Mar 26, 3:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, torbenh, (Sat Mar 26, 6:50 pm)
Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Lieven Moors, (Sat Mar 26, 11:23 pm)
Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback, Paul Davis, (Sat Mar 26, 9:02 pm)