On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 23:17 +0000, Chris Cannam wrote:
I like the apache 2.0 one because it's pretty and short and free of
lawyer. Alas, it's incompatible with (L)GPLv2... technically I could
make a similar header myself and use it, but there's no decent somewhat
canonical URI to refer to a BSD license I can find.
Of course we're all plenty used to just mentally skipping all the
boilerplate, but I like pretty things anyway :)
> > This made me notice something though: lv2.h itself is LGPL
We could attempt to contact everyone involved and get approval to switch
it and/or absolve themselves of copyright on it...
> > I am fully on the pro-GPL card-carrying FSF member team
The LGPL is wonderful. It lets you write a library that has the GPL
benefits (i.e. you can't take my code and proprietary-ize it without
sharing), while allowing proprietary projects to make use of the
library.
In a world free of selfish dickheads, public domain would be all we
need. In this one, the LGPL is nice :)
-dr
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
LINUX® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the USA and other countries.
Linuxaudio.org logo copyright Thorsten Wilms © 2006.
Hosting provided by the Virginia Tech Department of Music and DISIS.