Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <d@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 - 4:53 am

--001636499453e77309049cd7c082
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:20 PM, David Robillard wrote:

> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 20:05 +0000, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:

Hi David,

As a plugin developer, I'm very much looking forward to this, especially
since I proposed something similar to this a bit ago (
http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.o...
:)
But the fact that you're capable and willing to implement this solution
means a lot more than my confused half-baked ideas. I look forward to the
day when embedding and cross-toolkitedness walk hand in hand.

Jeremy

--001636499453e77309049cd7c082
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Da=
vid Robillard <d@dro=
billa.net
> wrote:

On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 20:05 +0000, Rui Nu=
no Capela wrote:

e list of
moment
I may
uld
c.
ong way
=A0We
for
d very definitely
t problem to get
same code
g is
(e.g.
ost can
row
=A0It is
ch the
n X UI
ne
author
soon),
y has
tell

Just because something right has not been implemented does not =
mean the
existing thing is right... (as your Gtk gripes illustrate)

Yes, clearly right now (excluding actually implementing the library),
using it is the pragmatic decision if you want a UI that works in a host
of any toolkit (and you don't need to embed UIs). =A0This situation,
however, is crap, and needs fixing.

> what has, and still is, outrageously wrong is that utter cannot-say-wh=
at

gasp)
n
br>

What? =A0The LV2 UI extension is toolkit agnotic. =A0It is not gtk ba=
sed
whatsoever. =A0Permit me a bit of yelling for emphasis:

PLEASE DO NOT SPREAD THE MISINFORMATION THAT THE LV2 UI EXTENSION IS GTK
BASED, OR BASED ON ANY OTHER TOOLKIT. =A0IT IS NOT, HAS NEVER BEEN, AND
NEVER WILL BE.

Sure, you (as a Qt person) don't like that most existing UIs happen to<=
br>
have been implemented in Gtk. =A0This is a problem with how we have
implemented UIs though, and not a problem with the UI extension itself.
That is, this is precisely the sort of problem that shows we need a
library to abstract this stuff (i.e. you are perfectly free to implement
Qt UIs, but then Gtk host authors have the same gripes).

I fully agree host authors should not have to deal with this (I
certainly don't want a bunch of Qt crap in my Gtk hosts either), that&#=
39;s
the entire point. =A0I take it further and don't believe plugin UI auth=
ors
should have to deal with it either.

We can get all the wins without:

=A0* Throwing out UI embedding, which really sucks for a lot of potential
UI designs (window hell sucks).

=A0* Forcing a particular toolkit, which will inevitably piss off everyone<=
br>
who doesn't like that particular toolkit, again really suck for a lot o=
f
potentially neat UI designs, and thus severely hurt adoption

=A0* Making plugin or host authors

Why throw out nice things if we don't have to? =A0Kludges in
implementations are fine, but kludges that affect what interfaces we
cooperate using are dangerous, particularly in the long term...

> please, don't give me nice talks about xembed and that stuff about=
gtk

for
wer
..

I am told it can work these days, unlike in the past. =A0Torben has s=
ome
experiments along those lines that work for him and at least some
others, but one direction (I can't remember which) didn't work for =
me.
Maybe it is indeed unrealistic, at least in some situations. =A0It doesn&#3=
9;t
really matter regardless, the design decision of where the
embed/external/whatever stuff belongs is orthogonal.

In other words, maybe embedding toolkit X in toolkit Y can work, maybe
it can not. =A0I am not sure, nor do I really care so much. =A0My point is<=
br>
definitely not that we should all depend on cross-toolkit embedding
working; the important point is that this problem (e.g. using a Gtk UI
in a Qt host) needs solving once, not a million kludgey times in every
host and UI implementation.

I do intend to write said library myself soon (I don't often talk about=

what I/we "will" do, but this is something of an LV2 UI state of =
the
union). =A0It is a high, but not top, priority for me right now (somewhere<=
br>
after releasing LV2r4, the new librdf-free slv2, and the LV2 persist
extension).

The important part, that I am suggesting very much needs doing ASAP, is
that getting a library interface implemented, so people can start using
it. =A0This does not depend on making embedding working, since the
fallback will be making an external windows. =A0We simply need something
like (obviously a simplification):

OpaqueWidget
lv2_ui_lib_load(ToolkitType requested_toolkit,
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0UI =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0plugin_ui)

Which will return a widget of the requested toolkit type, regardless of
the toolkit the UI is implemented. =A0There's a few possibilities:

=A01) Hooray, the toolkits match, and this will directly return the UI
widget, which you can embed or do whatever else you want with.

=A02) The toolkits do not match, and the library can implement
cross-toolkit embedding. =A0This will return a widget in the requested
toolkit that from the caller's perspective is the same as case 1.

=A03) The toolkits do not match, and cross-toolkit embedding is not
possible. =A0This will do the external UI thing (i.e. make a window, and
return a corresponding widget).

There are, in general, the 3 cases. =A0The jist of the current problem is
that implementers must make a decision that mandates an interface on
other implementers. =A0The library will make this problem go away, and
make these cases implementation details as they should be.

This is very much a pragmatic path, and not at all an ivory tower / pie
in the sky situation: whether or not a case (particularly 2) can work in
a given situation doesn't really matter - we have gained graceful
degradation and interface stability. =A0The first version will simply
implement cases 1 and 3 - providing the interface is the important part
that will solve the pressing problems with this situation.

Hopefully someone will figure out and contribute case 2, but this is not
a pressing (i.e. API related / community fragmenting) problem - just a
nicety.

Peace,

-dr

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lis=
ts.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Hi David,As=
a plugin developer, I'm very much looking forward to this, especially =
since I proposed something similar to this a bit ago (http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio=
.org/14098999.html
=A0:) =A0 But the fact that you're capable and wi=
lling to implement this solution means a lot more than my confused half-bak=
ed ideas. =A0I look forward to the day when embedding and cross-toolkitedne=
ss walk hand in hand.

Jeremy

--001636499453e77309049cd7c082--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Tom Szilagyi, (Thu Jan 13, 6:37 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Tom Szilagyi, (Fri Jan 14, 8:29 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Wed Feb 9, 4:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Chris Cannam, (Wed Feb 23, 8:21 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Wed Feb 23, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 24, 11:47 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Thu Feb 24, 4:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Thu Feb 24, 1:00 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Coccoli, (Thu Feb 10, 5:54 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Mon Feb 21, 7:40 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Rui Nuno Capela, (Wed Feb 9, 7:59 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Mon Feb 21, 7:22 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Jeremy Salwen, (Tue Feb 22, 4:53 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Tue Feb 22, 6:08 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Stefano D'Angelo, (Tue Feb 22, 6:50 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Tue Feb 22, 8:29 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Feb 23, 10:20 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Wed Feb 23, 4:32 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Philipp Überbacher, (Tue Feb 22, 10:31 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Feb 23, 9:52 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Philipp Überbacher, (Wed Feb 23, 11:00 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Feb 23, 1:43 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Feb 23, 3:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Feb 23, 4:55 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Gordon JC Pearce, (Wed Feb 23, 10:58 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 24, 12:55 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Thu Feb 24, 12:23 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 24, 12:11 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Gordon JC Pearce, (Thu Feb 24, 12:33 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 24, 12:39 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 24, 12:42 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 24, 11:43 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 24, 1:07 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 24, 2:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 24, 1:45 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 24, 1:02 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 24, 3:23 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 24, 4:17 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 24, 4:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 24, 5:39 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Feb 26, 3:41 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Mark Knecht, (Sun Feb 27, 12:18 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Feb 27, 1:17 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Thomas Vecchione, (Sun Feb 27, 12:05 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Feb 27, 9:38 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Andres Cabrera, (Sun Feb 27, 10:41 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Thomas Vecchione, (Sun Feb 27, 11:21 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Feb 27, 1:19 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Sat Feb 26, 3:52 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Renato, (Sat Feb 26, 9:44 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 24, 8:45 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 24, 9:20 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 24, 9:39 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Thu Feb 24, 11:48 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Fri Feb 25, 12:34 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Fri Feb 25, 5:52 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Fri Feb 25, 6:01 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Giblock, (Fri Feb 25, 8:43 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Jens M Andreasen, (Fri Feb 25, 12:43 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Fri Feb 25, 11:28 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Jens M Andreasen, (Fri Feb 25, 1:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Joel Roth, (Sat Feb 26, 4:59 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Feb 24, 10:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 24, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 24, 9:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 24, 9:58 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Nick Copeland, (Thu Feb 24, 10:02 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Thu Feb 24, 5:59 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, torbenh, (Thu Feb 24, 4:28 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 24, 4:31 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Thu Feb 24, 12:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Thorsten Wilms, (Thu Feb 24, 12:08 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Thu Feb 24, 5:11 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Arnold Krille, (Thu Feb 24, 6:35 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Michael Bechard, (Thu Feb 24, 6:49 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Harry Van Haaren, (Thu Feb 24, 8:11 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Michael Bechard, (Thu Feb 24, 8:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Thu Feb 24, 6:41 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Feb 24, 12:29 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Feb 23, 2:53 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Feb 23, 10:39 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Folderol, (Wed Feb 23, 1:42 pm)
Re: [LAD] [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Nick Copeland, (Tue Feb 22, 8:34 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Tue Feb 22, 6:55 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Tue Feb 22, 8:36 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Rui Nuno Capela, (Mon Feb 21, 8:27 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Mon Feb 21, 10:41 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Rui Nuno Capela, (Mon Feb 21, 11:18 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Tue Feb 22, 2:56 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Rui Nuno Capela, (Tue Feb 22, 9:44 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Tue Feb 22, 5:39 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, michael noble, (Wed Feb 23, 3:33 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Wed Feb 23, 8:00 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Rui Nuno Capela, (Wed Feb 23, 9:03 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Wed Feb 23, 4:17 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, torbenh, (Wed Feb 23, 9:57 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Rui Nuno Capela, (Wed Feb 23, 11:03 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Wed Feb 23, 5:23 pm)
[LAD] libsuil (was: IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb), Rui Nuno Capela, (Wed Feb 23, 7:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] libsuil (was: IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb), David Robillard, (Wed Feb 23, 7:39 pm)
Re: [LAD] libsuil, Rui Nuno Capela, (Wed Feb 23, 8:11 pm)
Re: [LAD] libsuil, David Robillard, (Thu Feb 24, 9:21 am)
Re: [LAD] libsuil, Rui Nuno Capela, (Thu Feb 24, 9:39 am)
Re: [LAD] libsuil, David Robillard, (Thu Feb 24, 4:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] libsuil, David Robillard, (Wed Feb 23, 9:29 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, torbenh, (Wed Feb 23, 11:44 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Rui Nuno Capela, (Tue Feb 22, 6:31 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Tue Feb 22, 8:02 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Giblock, (Tue Feb 22, 10:22 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Wed Feb 23, 1:22 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Giblock, (Wed Feb 23, 1:33 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Wed Feb 23, 1:31 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Mon Feb 21, 8:32 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Rui Nuno Capela, (Mon Feb 21, 10:53 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Tue Feb 22, 2:06 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Philipp Überbacher, (Fri Jan 14, 8:44 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Jan 15, 12:22 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Jan 15, 12:30 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Jan 15, 12:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Tom Szilagyi, (Fri Jan 14, 10:29 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Mon Feb 21, 7:32 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Feb 21, 8:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Mon Feb 21, 10:58 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Feb 21, 11:12 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Tue Feb 22, 2:27 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Tue Feb 22, 12:43 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Tue Feb 22, 5:52 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Tue Feb 22, 2:14 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Philipp Überbacher, (Tue Feb 22, 4:48 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Feb 22, 6:54 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Tue Feb 22, 4:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Philipp Überbacher, (Tue Feb 22, 8:50 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Tue Feb 22, 12:18 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Tue Feb 22, 1:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Nick Copeland, (Tue Feb 22, 12:45 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Cornette, (Wed Feb 23, 2:57 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Feb 22, 9:55 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Sean Bolton, (Tue Feb 22, 5:06 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Feb 22, 1:31 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Tue Feb 22, 1:11 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Nick Copeland, (Tue Feb 22, 1:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Tue Feb 22, 4:02 pm)
Re: [LAD] [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Nick Copeland, (Tue Feb 22, 6:33 pm)
Re: [LAD] [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Fons Adriaensen, (Tue Feb 22, 7:48 pm)
Re: [LAD] [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Tue Feb 22, 9:14 pm)
Re: [LAD] [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Tue Feb 22, 10:10 pm)
Re: [LAD] [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Philipp Überbacher, (Tue Feb 22, 9:31 pm)
[LAD] On LAD (WAS: Re: [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb), David Robillard, (Wed Feb 23, 1:11 am)
Re: [LAD] On LAD (WAS: Re: [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb), Lorenzo Sutton, (Wed Feb 23, 10:29 am)
Re: [LAD] On LAD (WAS: Re: [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb), Alexandre Prokoudine, (Wed Feb 23, 9:40 am)
Re: [LAD] [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Nick Copeland, (Tue Feb 22, 8:36 pm)
Re: [LAD] [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Arnold Krille, (Tue Feb 22, 8:59 pm)
Re: [LAD] [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Tue Feb 22, 8:41 pm)
Re: [LAD] [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Nick Copeland, (Tue Feb 22, 9:11 pm)
Re: [LAD] [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Devin Anderson, (Tue Feb 22, 9:43 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Paul Davis, (Tue Feb 22, 1:50 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Tom Szilagyi, (Tue Feb 22, 1:07 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, David Robillard, (Tue Feb 22, 3:00 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb, Michael Beer, (Thu Jan 13, 9:00 pm)