linuxaudio.org

--20cf305b0a367d55da04b3ae8d7e

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Iain Duncan

quoted text
> wrote:

>

> > Oops, perhaps I missed the boat on the ringbuffer, is the whole point

> that

> > with a ring buffer the memory for the max number of messages is

> > pre-allocated and we can just call by value in and out of the ringbuffer

> > without any memory management?

>

> correct.

>

Thanks. Does it make any difference who owns the ringbuffer? or is it cool

to just make them first from main and pass references in to the

constructors of whatever will use them?
iain
--20cf305b0a367d55da04b3ae8d7e

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Iain Duncan <iainduncanlists@gmail.com> wro=

te:
> Oops, perhaps I missed the boat on the ringbuffer, is the whole point =

that

quoted text
> with a ring buffer the memory for the max number of messages is

> pre-allocated and we can just call by value in and out of the ringbuff=

er

quoted text
> without any memory management?

correct.Thanks. Does it make any=

 difference who owns the ringbuffer? or is it cool to just make them first =

from main and pass references in to the constructors of whatever will use t=

hem?

iain
--20cf305b0a367d55da04b3ae8d7e--