linuxaudio.org

--_af0cff26-f4f0-4dc8-9928-0aebfa10cae3_

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> On my computer=2C sockets are sometimes slower than both pipes and queues=

.

quoted text
>=20

> However=2C by making sure the two processes doesn't change CPU during

> runtime=2C sockets are always the fastest=2C and I get consistent results=

:

That is useful. How consistent are the results people are getting though? W=

hen

I run with 1M messages the results are generally very flakey=2C 2=2C 4=2C 6=

 seconds=20

between different runs. If I use 10M then due to the far longer run time th=

en=20

the differences are will 2 to 6 seconds but the run time is a whole order o=

f=20

magnitude different give a different picture.
Will try and find an hour to run the tests with this CPU selection code.
Regards=2C nick.

 		 	   		  =
--_af0cff26-f4f0-4dc8-9928-0aebfa10cae3_

Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
&gt=3B On my computer=2C sockets are sometimes slower than both pipes and q=

ueues.&gt=3B &gt=3B However=2C by making sure the two processe=

s doesn't change CPU during&gt=3B runtime=2C sockets are always the fas=

test=2C and I get consistent results:That is useful. How consistent=

 are the results people are getting though? WhenI run with 1M messages =

the results are generally very flakey=2C 2=2C 4=2C 6 seconds between di=

fferent runs. If I use 10M then due to the far longer run time then the=

 differences are will 2 to 6 seconds but the run time is a whole order of <=

br>magnitude different give a different picture.Will try and find a=

n hour to run the tests with this CPU selection code.Regards=2C nic=

k.

=
--_af0cff26-f4f0-4dc8-9928-0aebfa10cae3_--