linuxaudio.org

--20cf305e240f90c6e204b2224029

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Paul Davis wrote:

quoted text
>

>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Iain Duncan

>> wrote:

>> > Just wondering if I understand this correctly. I making a loop based

>> app for

>> > step sequencing. When I previously did this in Csound, I clocked it off

>> a

>> > phasor, so the timing was sample accurate ( but that brought all it's

>> own

>> > issues to be sure ). I'm wondering whether I should do the same thing in

>> > jack app, or use the jack transport clock, or some hybrid.

>>

>> there was a proposal many (*many*) years ago from jesse chappell that

>> fully covered looping with JACK. it was never implemented. as it

>> stands, it is not possible to get seamless looping with jack

>> transport. in practice it might sound right for a given user with a

>> given set of clients, but change any aspect of the configuration and

>> it would no longer be seamless.

>>

>

>

Also, is that proposal a dead duck now? Seems to me like if it worked, it

would be a pretty killer feature given the popularity of the Ableton Live

style of working these days.

Has anyone else looked into it since then?
thanks

iain
--20cf305e240f90c6e204b2224029

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Iain Duncan=

 <iaindun=

canlists@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Iain Duncan <iainduncanlists@gmail.com&gt=

; wrote:

quoted text
> Just wondering if I understand this correctly. I making a loop based a=

pp for

quoted text
> step sequencing. When I previously did this in Csound, I clocked it of=

f a

quoted text
> phasor, so the timing was sample accurate ( but that brought all it&#3=

9;s own

quoted text
> issues to be sure ). I'm wondering whether I should do the same th=

ing in

quoted text
> jack app, or use the jack transport clock, or some hybrid.

there was a proposal many (*many*) years ago from jesse chappell that=
fully covered looping with JACK. it was never implemented. as it

stands, it is not possible to get seamless looping with jack

transport. in practice it might sound right for a given user with a

given set of clients, but change any aspect of the configuration and

it would no longer be seamless.=

Also, is that proposal a dead duck now? Se=

ems to me like if it worked, it would be a pretty killer feature given the =

popularity of the Ableton Live style of working these days.

Has anyone else looked into it since then?thanksiain
--20cf305e240f90c6e204b2224029--