Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, January 27, 2011 - 7:35 pm

--nextPart1549103.pD6nOrIqjS
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:51:26 Raymond Martin wrote:

I am _so_ glad the ideas of open source are not only about licenses...

> > if you had done this with ardour, i'd be raising bloody hell about it.

se

He would have the right to be pissed (and quite rightly so). Taking and=20
modifying someone elses work and not giving credit is troubling. Even if yo=
u=20
adhered to the license and didn't change the copyright notices...

> Any complaint that has nothing to do with licenses is just

Which is exactly what Paul Davis was talking about.

> I think we can all do without any of that noise, thank you.

ed

Strictly speaking in the term of laws you are correct. But as we gladly do =
not=20
live in a world exclusively ruled by laws, there is more to it than what th=
e=20
gpl says.

And FOSS is not only about a license. It is about giving credit where credi=
t=20
is due (otherwise the license would just be the famous "public domain" or "=
non=20
commercial public domain" or something like that).

But funnily enough while you accused Paul Davis of anger, it became clear t=
o=20
the whole list (and the world internet) that in fact you guys have a big=20
problem with paul and his work. So much you read personal things into=20
everything he says...
BTW: He probably wouldn't have a problem with it if your website reads=20
"Because ardour broke on us and the devs didn't want to do what we wanted, =
we=20
choose to fork muse". But apparently you have such a big problem with it th=
at=20
even that is for you to much acknowledgment of pauls work...

Anyway good luck with your project. Always sign of a good start when not=20
technical facts but personal reasons made you start it...

Have fun,

Arnold

--nextPart1549103.pD6nOrIqjS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk1ByO0ACgkQuYLL1cDjHx0dgACfQecosu7/8T55OFTHK0fmjtTr
98sAn2FQCe9bAUQN2E+l1HK3dorAh4hK
=Y+/y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1549103.pD6nOrIqjS--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, alex stone, (Thu Jan 27, 2:39 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Paul Davis, (Thu Jan 27, 4:08 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Raymond Martin, (Thu Jan 27, 4:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 27, 7:35 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Christopher Cherrett, (Thu Jan 27, 7:43 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Paul Davis, (Thu Jan 27, 4:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Christopher Cherrett, (Thu Jan 27, 8:11 pm)
[LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, drew Roberts, (Thu Jan 27, 7:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Brett McCoy, (Thu Jan 27, 8:36 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Thu Jan 27, 11:15 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Paul Davis, (Thu Jan 27, 8:40 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 27, 8:15 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Christopher Cherrett, (Thu Jan 27, 8:17 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Geoff Beasley, (Thu Jan 27, 8:39 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Christopher Cherrett, (Thu Jan 27, 8:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Geoff Beasley, (Thu Jan 27, 8:54 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Christopher Cherrett, (Thu Jan 27, 8:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Vytautas Jancauskas, (Thu Jan 27, 8:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Jens M Andreasen, (Sat Jan 29, 3:17 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, drew Roberts, (Mon Jan 31, 4:16 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Raymond Martin, (Sat Jan 29, 4:15 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Jens M Andreasen, (Sat Jan 29, 6:43 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Jan 29, 5:54 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Raymond Martin, (Sat Jan 29, 6:22 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Jan 29, 7:11 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, James Morris, (Sat Jan 29, 6:39 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Raymond Martin, (Sat Jan 29, 8:14 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, drew Roberts, (Mon Jan 31, 4:31 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Paul Davis, (Sat Jan 29, 9:17 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Alexandre Prokoudine, (Sat Jan 29, 9:08 pm)
Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?, Folderol, (Sat Jan 29, 7:14 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, alex stone, (Thu Jan 27, 4:47 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Paul Davis, (Thu Jan 27, 4:52 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Christopher Cherrett, (Thu Jan 27, 4:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Christopher Cherrett, (Thu Jan 27, 4:14 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Paul Davis, (Thu Jan 27, 4:32 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Christopher Cherrett, (Thu Jan 27, 4:37 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Chris Cannam, (Thu Jan 27, 4:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, mickski56, (Thu Jan 27, 3:59 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, alex stone, (Thu Jan 27, 5:33 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, Brett McCoy, (Thu Jan 27, 3:15 pm)
Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release, alex stone, (Thu Jan 27, 3:42 pm)