linuxaudio.org

--000325556512d0f8a304851f0d47

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Interesting, what you say!
Yes, I know about VST on Linux, but my aim of switching to Linux was to use

free technology, not switch an OS and then get back to emulating Windows

stuff.

But my question is not to put Windows down or anything, but just to

understand the general situation.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Ralf Mardorf

wrote:
> Louigi Verona wrote:

quoted text
>

>> Hey guys!

>>

>> I was wondering about the following.

>> On Windows we have lots and lots of plugins and synthesizers and effect

>> racks. On Linux the selection is much less variable.

>>

>> However, am I correct in understanding that the variety of the Windows

>> synths and plugins merely means that people take several core modules and

>> just rearrange them into different GUIs?

>> Am I correct in understanding that there are only several major algorithms

>> for things like filters, delays, reverbs and choruses?

>>

>> Louigi Verona.

>>

>

> Regarding to commercial software you are mistaken. Keep in mind that coders

> for commercial software get paid, hence they've got the resources, time and

> money to work on software more intensive. Software such as a synth choir

> that is able to sing lyrics written by you aren't just an assembly of filter

> and similar algorithms. Virtual Orchestras aren't just sample players, there

> is code that emulates a lot more, it's comparable to hardware such as the

> Yamaha Clavinova for piano sounds, it's not only generating a sound and

> using some filters etc., but a lot of development for very special

> algorithms.

>

> And because Windows has got more users, that means coders too, as Linux has

> got, there's also more shareware.

>

> Do you know that you can use VSTs on Linux too?

>

> 2 Cents,

> Ralf

>

--000325556512d0f8a304851f0d47

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Interesting, what you say!Yes, I know about VST on Linux, but m=

y aim of switching to Linux was to use free technology, not switch an OS an=

d then get back to emulating Windows stuff.But my question is not to pu=

t Windows down or anything, but just to understand the general situation.

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Ralf Mardo=

rf <ralf=

.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> wrote:

Louigi Verona wrote:
Hey guys!
I was wondering about the following.

On Windows we have lots and lots of plugins and synthesizers and effect rac=

ks. On Linux the selection is much less variable.
However, am I correct in understanding that the variety of the Windows synt=

hs and plugins merely means that people take several core modules and just =

rearrange them into different GUIs?

Am I correct in understanding that there are only several major algorithms =

for things like filters, delays, reverbs and choruses?
Louigi Verona.
Regarding to commercial software you are mistaken. Keep in mind that coders=

 for commercial software get paid, hence they've got the resources, tim=

e and money to work on software more intensive. Software such as a synth ch=

oir that is able to sing lyrics written by you aren't just an assembly =

of filter and similar algorithms. Virtual Orchestras aren't just sample=

 players, there is code that emulates a lot more, it's comparable to ha=

rdware such as the Yamaha Clavinova for piano sounds, it's not only gen=

erating a sound and using some filters etc., but a lot of development for v=

ery special algorithms.
And because Windows has got more users, that means coders too, as Linux has=

 got, there's also more shareware.
Do you know that you can use VSTs on Linux too?
2 Cents,

Ralf
--000325556512d0f8a304851f0d47--