linuxaudio.org

> From: David Olofson 
> These issues seem orthogonal to me. Addressing individual notes is just a

quoted text
> matter of providing some more information. You could think of it as MIDI

> using

> note pitch as an "implicit" note/voice ID. NoteOff uses pitch to "address"

> notes - and so does Poly Pressure, BTW!

Not exactly note-pitch. That's a common simplification/myth.

 MIDI uses 'key-number'. E.g. key number 12 is *usually* tuned to C0, but is

easily re-tuned to C1, two keys can be tuned to the same pitch yet still be

addressed independently.

 It's a common shortcut to say MIDI-key-number 'is the pitch', it's actually

an index into a table of pitches. Synths can switch that tuning table to

handle other scales.
A MIDI note-on causes a synth to allocate a physical voice. That physical

voice is temporarily mapped to that MIDI-key-number so that subsequent note

control is directed to that voice. The mapping is temporary. Once the note

is done the mapping is erased. Playing the same key later will likely

allocate a different physical voice.

 The MIDI-key-number is therefore an 'ID' mapping a control-source to a

physical-voice.
> Anyway, what I do in that aforementioned prototyping thing is pretty much

quoted text
> what

> was once discussed for the XAP plugin API; I'm using explicit "virtual

> voice

> IDs", rather than (ab)using pitch or some other control values to keep

> track of notes.

I agree that addressing notes unambiguously regardless of pitch (or any

other arbitrary property) is the ideal. I wish more sequencers were not

locked into a narrow 'western pop music' mode of operation.

  But many MIDI alternatives have been proposed without looking deeply

enough to realise that MIDI already supports very flexible note control.
MIDI's significant flaw is it's grossly outdated 7-bit resolution, the

underlying voice model is sound.
> Virtual voices are used by the "sender" to define and

quoted text
> address contexts, whereas the actual management of physical voices is done

> on the receiving end.

You have re-invented MIDI with different nomenclature ;-).
Best Regards,

Jeff McClintock
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev