linuxaudio.org

--0016e6dd8ec694cdf5048264a05d

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
fons wrote:
"Sequencers do this, but the possibilities are usually

rather limited."
Hm. Man, I must challenge this statement. "Limited" is of course a very

general and relative term, but in

sequencers I used - FL Studio, Ableton Live and actually even latest LMMS -

you basically can automate

almost any parameter, almost any knob or control you see. I am not sure this

state can be called "rather

limited". It is functional enough for me and most other musicians in the

world.
By automation I do not necessarily mean the software remembering how you

turn knobs - it can be just a

graph. When it does remember your turning, it still stores it as same

graphs, at least in FL Studio.
Louigi.
--0016e6dd8ec694cdf5048264a05d

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
fons wrote:"Sequencers do this, but the possibilities are usua=

lly

rather limited."Hm. Man, I must challenge this statement. &quo=

t;Limited" is of course a very general and relative term, but inse=

quencers I used - FL Studio, Ableton Live and actually even latest LMMS - y=

ou basically can automate

almost any parameter, almost any knob or control you see. I am not sure thi=

s state can be called "ratherlimited". It is functional enoug=

h for me and most other musicians in the world.By automation I do n=

ot necessarily mean the software remembering how you turn knobs - it can be=

 just a

graph. When it does remember your turning, it still stores it as same graph=

s, at least in FL Studio.Louigi.
--0016e6dd8ec694cdf5048264a05d--