Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Nedko Arnaudov <nedko@...>
Cc: Linux Audio Developers <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Friday, January 8, 2010 - 1:46 pm

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:

Well, I suppose as long as users are made aware that enabling it for
applications they aren't absolutely sure support it is a dangerous
thing to do. I don't like it, I think it's a simplification too far,
but then I'm not one of the people using it.

> Maybe you can watch the video, it is less than 5 minutes long.

I did actually watch that, when it was announced.

> Desktop session handler traditionally relies on X11. The trend in

GNOME is starting to use one. gnome-session switched to it in GNOME
2.24, completely breaking backward compatible session management
during that release series for lots of users, including me. Badly
done, but not intrinsically technically wrong.

> In future, ladish aims to save/restore window

That does sound like a desktop session manager to me.

Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, rosea grammostola, (Mon Jan 4, 12:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jan 8, 9:35 am)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Rui Nuno Capela, (Fri Jan 8, 9:54 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Nedko Arnaudov, (Fri Jan 8, 9:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Nedko Arnaudov, (Fri Jan 8, 10:37 am)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jan 8, 10:41 am)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Nedko Arnaudov, (Fri Jan 8, 11:01 am)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jan 8, 11:09 am)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Nedko Arnaudov, (Fri Jan 8, 11:19 am)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jan 8, 11:27 am)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Nedko Arnaudov, (Fri Jan 8, 11:51 am)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jan 8, 12:01 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Nedko Arnaudov, (Fri Jan 8, 12:07 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jan 8, 1:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Nedko Arnaudov, (Fri Jan 8, 1:37 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jan 8, 1:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, rosea grammostola, (Fri Jan 8, 12:27 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Nedko Arnaudov, (Fri Jan 8, 12:32 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, rosea grammostola, (Fri Jan 8, 12:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, rosea grammostola, (Fri Jan 8, 9:31 am)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Fri Jan 8, 12:55 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Nedko Arnaudov, (Fri Jan 8, 1:47 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Fri Jan 8, 2:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jan 8, 1:50 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Fri Jan 8, 2:06 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Chris Cannam, (Fri Jan 8, 2:16 pm)
Re: [LAD] Session Handlers and 'level 1' support, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Fri Jan 8, 3:31 pm)