Re: [LAD] interesting blog post about syncing blender and ardour

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Fons Adriaensen <fons@...>
Cc: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, September 24, 2009 - 10:38 pm

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

this isn't quite correct. ardour can slave to "varispeed" sync
sources, and tracks them with remarkable accuracy. there is an option
that is on by default which tells ardour to expect the timecode source
to be sample-clock-locked to whatever is driving JACK. if it is
enabled, ardour won't bother to even look for speed fluctuations. if
it is off, ardour will do varispeeding to stay very very closely in
sync with the timecode source. this option cannot currently be changed
via the GUI.

however. JACK transport doesn't support varispeed, so you cannot
convert a varispeeding timecode source into JACK transport.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] interesting blog post about syncing blender and ardour, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Sep 20, 10:26 pm)
[LAD] Animata on 64bit architecture, Ralf Mardorf, (Wed Sep 23, 5:26 am)
Re: [LAD] interesting blog post about syncing blender and ar..., Paul Davis, (Thu Sep 24, 10:38 pm)