Subject: Re: [LAD] linux audio standards base?

From: Kjetil S. Matheussen <k.s.matheussen@...> · Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009 - 10:12 am

Patrick Shirkey:

quoted text>

> On 08/08/2009 09:57 PM, Jens M Andreasen wrote:

>> On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 16:44 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote:

>>

>>

>>> Here's what I have found after extensive testing with the latest dev

>>> version of pulseaudio-v0.9.16-4 and jack-0.116.1 on a 2 core amd, 4GB

>>> notebook running Fedora 11.

>>>

>>> 1. 32 bit apps will not play on a 64 bit pulseaudio easily or at all.

>>> 2. Skype, Realplayer/Helix and Flash are a pain to get working with

>>> pulseaudio if they work at all.

>>>

>>

>> These two items are related, right? Does it go away with a

>> 32bit/extended kernel?

>>

>>

>

>

> I haven't tested with a 32 bit system. I'm not sure if I will get the

> time for that. I don't think in this case it has much to do with the

> kernel. I think it is because pulse is compiled for 64 bit and the apps

> are looking for 32 bit libs.

>
Well, there's your problem. It's great that you try out new

software though, but of course then you'll get more stability

issues as well.
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev