linuxaudio.org

On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:49:08 Patrick Shirkey wrote:

quoted text
> On 08/09/2009 05:44 AM, drew Roberts wrote:

> > On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey wrote:

> >> Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork?  Is there a guide

> >> that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for

> >> making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually

> >> forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended

> >> result of your efforts?

> >

> > Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this

> > point at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists is

> > the original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along with

> > new text documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from checking

> > either of the projects.)

>

> So this is a pre fork or a split or a bend but not an outright fork?

>

> IMO, it's so close to a fork as to be almost negligible.

>

> It's all the ground work in place but none of the follow through.

>

> It's like a "psyche" intended to frighten the recipient without actually

> doing anything specific?

>

Yeah, the ground shakes and you get all frightened, but not much happens,

yet!
The Impro-Visor code is out and on SF, so it worked, didn't it.
Raymond
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev