linuxaudio.org

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:33:22AM +0100, Nick Bailey wrote:
> Well, calling it your own is out of order, but as long as they release their

quoted text
> source code as required by the GPL, then selling it is a Good Thing (TM). I

> hope the LADs agree with me. I would certainly be delighted if my GPL'd stuff

> (which isn't directly related to LAD) got sold. It would mean more GPL'd

> applications.

Two question arise:
- Is a program that loads LADSPA plugins (at run time) a

  'derived work' ? Note that anyone can create a 'clean'

  version of ladpsa.h, as some people did with the VST

  headers.
- If an installer (run on the end user's machine)

  fetches the plugins from their official site, would

  this be 'distribution' ?
My first guess would be no, no.
Ciao,
--

FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev