linuxaudio.org

On Monday 03 Aug 2009 21:29:48 Michael Fisher wrote:

quoted text
> No problem.  It's not really fair to put a 'skin' around free software,

> call it your own, and then sell it.  The only thing I ask is that my

> name be left out of the letter that may be written to them.  The reason

> is, that I personally know one of the staff members at the Beat Kangz. I

> just would hate to have it cause any trouble.  My friend personally

> doesn't have anything to do with this violation, he just works for

> them.  I hope that isn't a problem with you.

Well, calling it your own is out of order, but as long as they release their

source code as required by the GPL, then selling it is a Good Thing (TM). I

hope the LADs agree with me. I would certainly be delighted if my GPL'd stuff

(which isn't directly related to LAD) got sold. It would mean more GPL'd

applications.
I hope they decide to use the GPL rather than reinvent the wheel. Let's hope

Beat Kangz will see the light if the benefits are explained to them properly.
N/.
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev