linuxaudio.org

On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 21:25 +0200, Julien Claassen wrote:

quoted text
> Hello Ken!

>    I can contribute little, but it may still push you in one direction.

>    I've seen both some QT-code and understood it and I've seen some gtk+, which

> I had more problems understanding. So I think QT might be easier to implement.

> Also QT has a lot by itself, nice helpers.

>    GTK now may be as easy to write, just me not understanding it, I'm not too

> bright at it though. But GTK is good to use for blind people, because of the

> Gnome people pushing some accessibiloity stuff. Also gtk and the glib have to

> offer many things, which might come in handy.

>    One last remark and I drop off; GTK+ might not be that easy to read for me,

> because GTK is originally in C and gtk+ - as I understand - was kind of a

> complex wrapper for it.

>    Kindest regards

>           Julien

Gtkmm is quite nice for the more C++ minded.  Much nicer standard C++

style than the cracked out preprocessed pseudo-C++ insanity that is Qt,

at any rate.
The documentation is pretty crap in some places though.
-dr
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev