linuxaudio.org

Le 23 juin 09 à 17:04, Paul Davis a écrit :
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Gene Heskett > wrote:

quoted text
>>

>> PA is one of the biggest screwups ever, but red hat can't see it.

>

> This type of response is incredibly unhelpful. Lennart and others

> involved with PA have made their goals clear, their design assumptions

> clear, their overall design philosophy clear, and their use cases

> clear. PA continues to evolve toward fulfilling all of these.

>

> How is that a screwup? What other system, real or proposed, is

> attempting to tackle the issues that PA is? You can argue that the use

> cases don't matter to you, you can argue that PA needs to be "more

> optional", you can suggest that some of the design assumptions are

> wrong, and so on. But how is it a "screwup"? How does labelling it in

> this way help anything? Even if PA isn't "about" anything that you

> think is important, enough other people with different goals and use

> cases have decided that it very much is about things that matter very

> much to them and the user groups they try to serve.

>

> I would really like it if Lennart continued participating in this

> thread, and with the LAD community in general, but he has pretty ample

> reason not to given the tone of this kind of response.

>

> --p

I would certainly help if we can keep the discussion on "technical

issues" a bit more, since I don't think the subject is completely

closed yet...
(like the issue with  sched-rt-group thing for instance...  http://ww2.cs.fsu.edu/~rosentha/linux/2.6.26.5/docs/scheduler/sched-rt-g...)
Stephane

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev