linuxaudio.org

On Mon, 22.06.09 23:19, Jörn Nettingsmeier (nettings@folkwang-hochschule.de) wrote:
> so what is this about? rt users want absolute control over their

quoted text
> machine. anybody who can tolerate some arbitrary bits of policy thrown

> at them during work is by definition not an rt user.

> rt users must be trustable with root access, at least in terms of cpu

> governance, which is what rtlimits achivev just fine.

What is so difficult to understand that rtkit is not intended to be a

solution for hardcore rt users? 
rtkit is not for you!
Let me repeat this:
RTKIT IS NOT FOR YOU!
rtkit is a just missing piece of the puzzle that allows distros to

enable RT by default for their desktop users.
And rtkit doesn't break RLIMIT_PRIO, it isn't even activated when that

is set.
Let me repeat this, too:
RTKIT DOESN'T BREAK RLIMIT_RTPRIO!
It was clearly a bad idea to post about rtkit on lad. It is a big

waste of time fighting this through against all those desktop-haters,

fdo-haters, dbus-haters, who apparently believe I am out to take away

their freedom to run their systems the way want. I really don't need

this shit. The amount of constructive criticism in this thread is next

to zero, nobody even bothers to read the README before just fudding

around. 
Lennart
--

Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.

lennart [at] poettering [dot] net

http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev