Re: [LAD] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 - 1:44 pm

On Tuesday, 19 May 2009 at 10:38, Stéphane Letz wrote:

Wouldn't a dbus-based control application jackd work? I.e. a wrapper around the
dbus jack that behaves like the old jackd? (It seems like the obvious solution
to me, but I haven't read that much of this discussion, just part of what was
on this list, so if this is the stupid kind of obvious, just ignore me.)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus..., Stéphane Letz, (Tue May 19, 8:42 am)
Re: [LAD] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus..., Christian Ohm, (Tue May 19, 1:44 pm)
Re: [LAD] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus..., drew Roberts, (Tue May 19, 11:55 am)
Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus..., Jens M Andreasen, (Tue May 19, 12:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus..., Rui Nuno Capela, (Tue May 19, 10:37 am)