Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <hollunder@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 - 11:57 am

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

writes:

> Don't know if that would be sensible but so far the only way to tell

No. manually editing the xml file is not good idea unless you are sure
that you will not override them accidentally through dbus
interface. jack2 compes with a tool, jack_control. You can change all
settings with it. laditools do use the dbus interface. lash also uses
it. patchage can use it. lpatchage uses it always.

=2D-=20
Nedko Arnaudov

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKEp6P6bb4v94XFrARAnYXAKCP4sEk/raRpmN08NN2zdXxA3bB1gCfeRKZ
jdSUFJiFmFJEG7IbbYCjFKM=
=OPAR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus..., Stéphane Letz, (Tue May 19, 8:42 am)
Re: [LAD] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus..., Christian Ohm, (Tue May 19, 1:44 pm)
Re: [LAD] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus..., drew Roberts, (Tue May 19, 11:55 am)
Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus..., Jens M Andreasen, (Tue May 19, 12:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus..., Rui Nuno Capela, (Tue May 19, 10:37 am)
Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus..., Nedko Arnaudov, (Tue May 19, 11:57 am)