Subject: Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus...

From: <hollunder@...> · Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 - 11:52 am

On Tue, 19 May 2009 12:25:35 +0100

Damon Chaplin  wrote:
>

quoted text> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 11:37 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:

>

> > the main question, at least in my mind, is all about *which*

> > settings will be used to auto-start the server, isn't it? an

> > explicit command line, as in "classic", should *always* take

> > precedence over the settings in any internal configuration

> > database, which i think the "d-bus" honors instead and that latter

> > behavior is being the root of all "d-bus" evil. scnrt ;)

>

> If jackdbus migrated the settings from .jackdrc the first time it is

> run that would probably save a lot of hassle.

>

> Damon
Don't know if that would be sensible but so far the only way to tell

jackdbus what settings to use is by editing the xml file or using

laditools, which hardly anyone used so far and isn't included in any

distribution. ladi is, to my knowledge, the only thing that uses the

dbus interface so far.
Philipp

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev