On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> The only person I can recall who had an explicit objection to it was
I recall a few people agreeing with Fons. Plus, Fons is so
frigging thorough that... what should we write? "Yeah!!
What he said!" Hardly an important contribution to the
Also, with the reception that Fons got, I'm sure there were
a few like me who kept their mouths shut unless they had
something important to contribute.
Anyway, FWIW, I agreed 100% with Fons... and IIRC he was
open to having an in-JACK session management API provided
that it played nice with a larger, more comprehensive
session manager. (I.e. partial session loading/saving, no
client renaming, etc.)
Linux-audio-dev mailing list