linuxaudio.org

On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> The only person I can recall who had an explicit objection to it was

quoted text
> Fons, who said he would stop using jack if it was accepted. Given that

[snip]

quoted text
> anyway).  I don't think he should be allowed to make the decision for

> the rest of us about what is accepted to trunk and what is not. Also

I recall a few people agreeing with Fons.  Plus, Fons is so

frigging thorough that... what should we write?  "Yeah!!

What he said!"  Hardly an important contribution to the

discussion.
Also, with the reception that Fons got, I'm sure there were

a few like me who kept their mouths shut unless they had

something important to contribute.
Anyway, FWIW, I agreed 100% with Fons... and IIRC he was

open to having an in-JACK session management API provided

that it played nice with a larger, more comprehensive

session manager.  (I.e. partial session loading/saving, no

client renaming, etc.)
-gabriel
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev