linuxaudio.org

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Louigi Verona  wrote:

quoted text
> Modular environment is great, but integrated environment seems to be more

> effective.

statements like this are meaningless without clear qualifiers. feel

free to say "for the kind of audio/music composition that I do, and

the workflow that i use, i find an integrated environment more

effective". please don't try to make blanket statements about the way

that people use tools.
> But I also have a suggestion.

quoted text
> Is it possible to create an integrated environment based on modules? That

> is, an app which would have "plugins", but not plugins in a

> sense like effects and synths only, but plugins as elements of the sequencer

> itself, like piano roll, song editor, such stuff. A person opens this app

> and starts adding elements he needs to it. For a particular project he might

> not need a piano roll, he might need only audio track arranger,

> for another projects he takes an audio track arranger and also adds a piano

> roll.

> Modules of such an app could be very different, like a loop player like

> Kluppe, etc - all the apps linux audio has to this day but remade as modules

> to an integrated sequencer.

>

> What do you think?

i think you are new to linux audio. i also think that like most users

of software, you don't actually know what you want or need - this is

not a slam or a negative criticism, just a fact of life. it wouldn't

be a problem if developers like me knew what you wanted or needed too,

but alas, neither do we.
--p

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev