linuxaudio.org

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:23:54AM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote:

quoted text
> Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:

> > When I'm not in group 1, I'm hanging out in group 4.

> > Inter-host and headless session management is important to

> > me, too.

> >

> > I really do hope that Fons releases his code. :-)

>

> @Fons, thanks for your reply. It seems that you're not planned to make a

> session handler for the mass... That's not bad at all in many cases.

> Good luck with it and I hope you decide to release your code.

>

> Ok, roughly we have 4 groups now (assuming that we can call >1

> individuals a group ;) )

>

> Group 1 has spoken, group 3 and group 4.

>

> What can we expect from group 2? Maybe some of the lash developers

> belongs in this group?

> Dave, Juuso, Bob Ham, ... ? What are your plans now?

dunno... jack session is frozen now.

it took a huge flame war to find out some implications of the

requirements.
so basically i dont think we can reach consensus.

and sessionhandling is _only_ about consensus. its not a problem at all

to implement.
lad is dead.
>

quoted text
>

> Regards,

>

> \r

>

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Linux-audio-dev mailing list

> Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

--

torben Hohn

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev