Re: [LAD] LADI

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Sunday, December 20, 2009 - 11:27 am

I'd have to disagree with this. A modular environment makes for better
use of resource.
Plugins occupy the same memory allocation as the app, and the same is
true in win and mac. For all the perceived benefits of a "one stop
shop" as far as workflow goes, there are drawbacks. It's noted that
some users are ok with freezing tracks to best manage limited
resources, but other's aren't. I spent a large chunk of my working
life bouncing tracks on a constant basis, and unlike the linux
environment, i didn't have a choice, no matter the strength of
hardware i was using. It wasn't that long ago that if you wanted to
run a full orchestral template, plus plugins, you needed a cluster of
boxes, or a CRAY. I had a cluster of 5 gig boxes PRECISELY because of
the limitations of allocated app memory space, and i was still
bouncing tracks, if i wanted to run plugins as well.

The modular environment offers a way out of this workflow killer
(imho), and with the massive advantage of using jack, with its
unlimited port structure, plugins no longer need to reside inside an
app, but can be effectively hosted and ported to and from, outside the
app, and in their own memory allocation.

So i would vote against a push to put everything in one app. Quite the
contrary, based on experience, and the many many frustrating hours i
put into bouncing tracks, and handling a pandora's box worth of
workarounds, just to get the client's material done.

Again, i perceive this drive to centralise everything into one "super"
app, as an intent to be "just like" win and mac, including the obvious
and frustrating workflow limitations, along with any
perceived.....advantages, when a little applied imagination on the
part of users would reveal a much greater use of resource, and
workflow satisfaction, in an unlimited workstation, where only the
strength of the hardware, and the corresponding depth of the user's
wallet, applies.

There's also the perception that having "lots" of plugins inside an
app is somehow.........cool, and "the best way to work". It isn't,
beyond the first hour of use. Managing lots of plugins is as much, and
possibly more of a time killer, than setting up a multiapp template in
a linux audio environment. Been there, done that, and it's no
sinecure.

So no to centralisation, and yes to developing dedicated external lv2
plugin hosting more effectively. (Multi hosts, for example.) The power
of JACK should not be underestimated in this regard, and the real work
lies (imho) in managing software resource, i.e. sessions, port
connections, save states across clusters, etc... This would focus any
technical lv2 expectations in one spot, and remove the need to hack
sequencers constantly, as the lv2 protocol develops further.

As for multiple app management, you might be missing the boat a bit
here as well. Unlike Win and Mac, with the commerically imposed
limitations, linux gives you more than one to lead an elephant across
a pond of custard.

Outside of the mainstream distros, who are generally more
commerical-like in their presentation, there's a wealth of choice for
users to really build a great system, unique to requirements. I run
Gentoo, and the fluxbox window manager, with no icons, and driven by
keybindings. Where an app can run without a GUI, then i do that from a
script, or a terminal, saving resources for something else. Linux is
extremely openended in that regard, and with a bit of effort of the
part of a user, he or she can see a direct relationship between effort
in/reward out. So the resources that are chewed up by endless GUI's,
now go where they belong, into running the DAW, for practical use. (I
have in a normal template 7 apps running, of which only 2 are GUI's
for constant use.)

Also worth noting here that apps like Jconvolver, for instance, can be
run as a standalone single instance, with multiple ins and outs, each
one of which can be configured in a file. 1 impulse for an entire
project, with each in/out configurable.
There's 65 plugins taken care of right there, in one small cli app............

So Louigi, i disagree with you, and think it IS a personal preference,
and should not be an imposed workflow.

Why walk with the rest of the turkeys, when you can soar like an eagle?

Alex.

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Louigi Verona wrote:

--
www.openoctave.org

midi-subscribe@openoctave.org
development-subscribe@openoctave.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] LADI, Nedko Arnaudov, (Fri Nov 20, 8:16 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Danni Coy, (Sat Nov 21, 4:17 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Sean Corbett, (Sat Nov 21, 3:50 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sat Nov 21, 2:01 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Nov 21, 3:07 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Paul Davis, (Sat Nov 21, 4:21 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Mon Nov 23, 11:49 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Nov 21, 5:19 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Paul Davis, (Sat Nov 21, 2:45 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Mon Nov 23, 12:26 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Gene Heskett, (Mon Nov 23, 4:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Adrian Knoth, (Mon Nov 23, 1:17 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, , (Tue Nov 24, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Loki Davison, (Mon Nov 23, 10:17 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Tue Nov 24, 8:53 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Adrian Knoth, (Tue Nov 24, 3:53 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Tue Nov 24, 10:11 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, rosea grammostola, (Sat Dec 19, 8:15 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Tue Dec 22, 7:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Adrian Knoth, (Wed Dec 23, 10:58 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Wed Dec 23, 1:08 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Wed Dec 23, 1:43 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Wed Dec 23, 1:59 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Dec 22, 8:19 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Tue Dec 22, 11:40 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, , (Sat Dec 19, 10:23 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Tue Dec 22, 8:02 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Sun Dec 20, 5:25 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, rosea grammostola, (Sun Dec 20, 10:24 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, torbenh, (Sun Dec 20, 12:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Tue Dec 22, 7:17 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, rosea grammostola, (Sun Dec 20, 8:11 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, torbenh, (Sun Dec 20, 11:18 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, rosea grammostola, (Mon Dec 21, 10:45 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Tue Dec 22, 8:35 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Nedko Arnaudov, (Tue Dec 22, 9:22 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, rosea grammostola, (Wed Dec 23, 10:25 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Nedko Arnaudov, (Thu Dec 24, 6:35 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Dec 25, 2:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Fri Dec 25, 11:12 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 27, 2:11 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Nedko Arnaudov, (Sun Dec 27, 2:28 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 27, 2:44 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 27, 2:26 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Dec 26, 1:48 am)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], james morris, (Sat Dec 26, 11:18 am)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], Arnold Krille, (Sun Dec 27, 3:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Dec 26, 12:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], james morris, (Sat Dec 26, 12:41 pm)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], Paul Davis, (Sat Dec 26, 2:11 pm)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], james morris, (Sat Dec 26, 10:32 pm)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], Arnold Krille, (Sun Dec 27, 3:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], james morris, (Sun Dec 27, 4:38 pm)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 27, 7:20 am)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], Paul Davis, (Sun Dec 27, 1:52 pm)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Dec 28, 6:49 pm)
Re: [LAD] JackMix [was: LADI], Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Dec 26, 12:50 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, hermann, (Sat Dec 26, 4:25 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, rosea grammostola, (Fri Dec 25, 3:39 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Dec 25, 4:16 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Adrian Knoth, (Fri Dec 25, 7:49 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, rosea grammostola, (Wed Jan 6, 1:24 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Dec 25, 8:01 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, rosea grammostola, (Fri Dec 25, 4:32 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Dec 25, 4:31 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Wed Dec 23, 12:00 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Nedko Arnaudov, (Wed Dec 23, 11:29 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Wed Dec 23, 12:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, David Robillard, (Tue Dec 22, 4:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, rosea grammostola, (Tue Dec 22, 5:24 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Chris Cannam, (Mon Dec 21, 9:33 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Dec 21, 8:56 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, alex stone, (Mon Dec 21, 9:22 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Dec 21, 9:36 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, alex stone, (Mon Dec 21, 9:45 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Dec 21, 10:12 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Mon Dec 21, 1:40 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Mon Dec 21, 10:55 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Dec 22, 12:36 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, torbenh, (Tue Dec 22, 3:31 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Dec 22, 5:33 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Thorsten Wilms, (Tue Dec 22, 9:36 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, alex stone, (Tue Dec 22, 7:29 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Dec 22, 12:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, alex stone, (Tue Dec 22, 12:30 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Dec 22, 1:04 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, alex stone, (Tue Dec 22, 2:09 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Tue Dec 22, 2:33 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Dec 22, 7:29 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Dec 22, 7:41 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Dave Phillips, (Tue Dec 22, 2:42 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Dec 22, 1:02 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Nedko Arnaudov, (Mon Dec 21, 10:34 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, alex stone, (Mon Dec 21, 11:07 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, James Warden, (Mon Dec 21, 11:26 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Louigi Verona, (Sun Dec 20, 8:31 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Christopher Cherrett, (Sun Dec 20, 10:20 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Dec 20, 1:22 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Louigi Verona, (Sun Dec 20, 12:48 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 20, 1:21 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Dec 20, 1:19 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Louigi Verona, (Sun Dec 20, 9:33 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Tue Dec 22, 5:45 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Paul Davis, (Tue Dec 22, 5:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Bob Ham, (Tue Dec 22, 11:35 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Paul Davis, (Sun Dec 20, 1:40 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Jostein Chr. Andersen, (Sun Dec 20, 2:20 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, alex stone, (Sun Dec 20, 11:27 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Louigi Verona, (Sun Dec 20, 11:52 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, rosea grammostola, (Sun Dec 20, 12:55 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, alex stone, (Sun Dec 20, 12:21 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Nedko Arnaudov, (Sun Dec 20, 10:31 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Louigi Verona, (Sun Dec 20, 10:32 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Dec 20, 1:32 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Paul Davis, (Tue Nov 24, 4:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Rui Nuno Capela, (Tue Nov 24, 5:10 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Paul Davis, (Tue Nov 24, 4:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, , (Tue Nov 24, 5:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Paul Davis, (Tue Nov 24, 5:55 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, , (Tue Nov 24, 7:28 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Paul Davis, (Tue Nov 24, 7:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, , (Tue Nov 24, 9:41 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Chris Cannam, (Tue Nov 24, 8:19 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Florian Faber, (Mon Nov 23, 1:37 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Nov 21, 3:01 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, David Robillard, (Sat Nov 21, 9:54 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sat Nov 21, 11:13 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Nov 21, 2:48 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sat Nov 21, 3:37 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Nov 21, 6:12 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sat Nov 21, 6:21 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Nov 21, 6:24 pm)
Re: [LAD] LADI, , (Sat Nov 21, 12:00 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, Victor Lazzarini, (Sat Nov 21, 12:51 am)
Re: [LAD] LADI, , (Sat Nov 21, 12:12 pm)