linuxaudio.org

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, fons@kokkinizita.net wrote:
>> 1) The 'one app with plugins' group. People who are focusing on one big

quoted text
>> app, extended by plugins (Ardour, Qtractor, LV2/DSSI). This group

>> doesn't have much interest in a session handler.

>

> And quite probably the authors of these apps are not very

> motivated to make them compatible with session handlers.

Over the past few months I've decided that I'm in group #1.

Session management is good... but it requires /some/ level

of consensus.  I think LAD (at present) is too hostile to

achieve this without some sort of "politician" showing up to

unify the devs (and it ain't me, babe).
That said, I'm open to adding session management to my

applications and would love it if session management could

succeed.
> 4. And there's group 4, or maybe that group is just me.

quoted text
> If there are others I'd like to know. For group 4:

When I'm not in group 1, I'm hanging out in group 4.

Inter-host and headless session management is important to

me, too.
I really do hope that Fons releases his code. :-)
-gabriel

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev