Re: [LAD] Anyone have experience with OSS (3 or 4)?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, December 17, 2009 - 3:54 pm

Lennart Poettering:

Okay, I didn't know that. But this is still no reason
why ALSA shouldn't take care of mixing/scheduling/etc.
by itself plus providing low-latency performance
(with mixing) when that is required. Leaving out
mixing to third-parties, plus exposing a very
complicated low-level API and a complicated
plugin/configuration system (which probably
has taken a more time to develop than implementing
a proper mixing engine), has created lots of chaos.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] Anyone have experience with OSS (3 or 4)?, Kjetil S. Matheussen, (Thu Dec 17, 3:54 pm)
Re: [LAD] Anyone have experience with OSS (3 or 4)?, Lennart Poettering, (Thu Dec 17, 4:47 pm)