linuxaudio.org

On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 10:45:50AM -0500, David Robillard wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 23:09 +0100, fons@kokkinizita.net wrote:

quoted text
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 12:52:52PM -0500, David Robillard wrote:

> >

> > > This wouldn't be an LV2 plugin at all.

> >

> > In spirit, no. But technically it would be a

> > perfectly conforming plugin.

>

> Huh?  An LV2 plugin in the code sense is a shared library with a

> lv2_descriptor function that returns a struct LV2_Descriptor (just like

> LADSPA).

Yes. Please rewind a few messages and read again.

The idea was an extension that requires the host

to obtain a pointer to a C++ object from the plugin.

This C++ object (derived from some base class which

is part of the extension definition) then provides

all other information (ports, process method, etc.).

This would bypass all LV2 methods, but still be an

LV2 plugin.
Ciao,
--

FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev