Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Friday, October 2, 2009 - 8:04 pm

--nextPart1941322.RSzLbcCick
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 02 October 2009 21:02:09 Jens M Andreasen wrote:

dbus has nothing to do with dns-lookups. In principle dbus is network-
transparent. But in practice only with complicated authentication (that onl=
y=20
works on the same computer) or with a special patch to allow anonymous=20
connections. So the default mode of the servers don't activate network=20
support.

The magic it provides:
De-coupling functionality from the gui. And allowing several guis to repres=
ent=20
the same at the same time. And IPC in general.

> I am asking this because I am experiencing that the 'Kit'-family is

Unless I missed a dbus-kit, one has nothing to do with another.

But I concur that the *kit crap is taking much to much space and time.
Someone should write drop-in packages that satisfy dependencies but don't r=
un=20
the stuff.

Arnold

--nextPart1941322.RSzLbcCick
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkrGXM8ACgkQuYLL1cDjHx1YxACeP/ViVQC5kl5edXrOdvAyc0Su
j5QAn3JFcX1UVG0NOnANzGrxeDIKzL1d
=8zkM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1941322.RSzLbcCick--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Rui Nuno Capela, (Wed Sep 30, 6:54 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Jens M Andreasen, (Fri Oct 2, 7:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Patrick Shirkey, (Fri Oct 2, 10:29 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sat Oct 3, 11:03 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Oct 3, 9:02 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sat Oct 3, 10:16 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Oct 3, 10:47 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sun Oct 4, 9:37 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Ray Rashif, (Sun Oct 4, 4:15 am)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Arnold Krille, (Fri Oct 2, 8:04 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Jussi Laako, (Fri Oct 2, 8:50 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Fons Adriaensen, (Fri Oct 2, 7:48 pm)
Re: [LAD] [ANN] QjackCtl 0.3.5 slipped away!, Jens M Andreasen, (Fri Oct 2, 9:25 pm)