linuxaudio.org

On Wednesday 03 September 2008 09:39:37 am Carl-Erik Kopseng wrote:

quoted text
> Looking at the

> not-to-well-documented lame library I (think) that Lame only support

> sample rates up to 48kHz, so I would need to convert the samplerate

> and bitrate through the use of an other library. 

This is a limitation of the MPEG 1/2 standard, not of lame *per se*.
> Regarding the downsampling I would like to know if I would get any

quoted text
> funny artifacts when downsampling 96kHz material to 44.1kHz (not even

> division). Would I be better of to convert to 48kHz for 96kHz

> material?

FWIW, I would think 48 kHz would be a better approach, as you'd be preserving

(marginally) better quality from the original 96 kHz source (not to mention

having to mess around with padding bits and other hackery that MPEG uses to

make 44.1 work).
Cheers!
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Frederick F. Gleason, Jr. |               Chief Developer               |

|                           |               Paravel Systems               |

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Please try to limit the amount of "this room doesn't have any bazingas" |

| until you are told that those rooms are "punched out".  Once punched    |

| out, we have a right to complain about atrocities, missing bazingas,    |

| and such.                                                               |

|                                          -- N. Meyrowitz                |

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev