linuxaudio.org

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Kjetil S. Matheussen

 wrote:

quoted text
>

>

> Thanks to all. Those sounds like good arguments.

> I'm still a little bit reluctant against wavex

> though, because googling for the wavex format

> hardly gives any relevant hits.

>

> But I guess it's better than wav anyway, so

> I'm going to change something. Are you sure

> there's no other format that might be a

> better alternative than wavex?

>

> And I also wonder if wavex are able

> to handle >4GB files? (I couldn't find

> any spec about the format on the net)

> Because if wavex is not able to handle

> more than 4>GB files I have to enable

> the same workaround as for wav files.

>

> _______________________________________________

> Linux-audio-dev mailing list

> Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

>

you get a lot more useful hits on google with WAVE_FORMAT_EXTENSIBLE

than wavex it seems.
Loki

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev