Re: [LAD] LV2 dyanic manifest extension proposal

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stefano D'Angelo <zanga.mail@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Monday, June 9, 2008 - 9:11 am

On 9 Jun 2008, at 08:57, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:

You're right, we never defined the lv2:binary predicate.

That should be fixed.

- Steve
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] LV2 dyanic manifest extension proposal, Stefano D'Angelo, (Sun Jun 8, 1:32 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 dyanic manifest extension proposal, Steve Harris, (Sun Jun 8, 10:20 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 dyanic manifest extension proposal, Stefano D'Angelo, (Sun Jun 8, 11:51 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 dyanic manifest extension proposal, Steve Harris, (Mon Jun 9, 7:32 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 dyanic manifest extension proposal, Stefano D'Angelo, (Mon Jun 9, 7:58 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 dyanic manifest extension proposal, Steve Harris, (Mon Jun 9, 9:11 am)
[LAD] More proposed LV2 addition/extension stuff, Krzysztof Foltman, (Mon Jun 9, 10:24 pm)
Re: [LAD] More proposed LV2 addition/extension stuff, Nedko Arnaudov, (Tue Jun 10, 8:31 am)