Subject: Re: [LAD] Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3

From: Marc-Olivier Barre <mobarre@...> · Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2008 - 6:46 pm

On Feb 5, 2008 4:56 PM, Bob Ham  wrote:

quoted text> > If you want 'real' session management, you also want to save the jack-settings

> > per session.

>

> This was addressed elsewhere.  The issue is the dynamicity of JACK.

> Rewriting LASH to use D-Bus because you don't want to fix JACK is

> lunacy.

That's precisely *NOT* the reason why me, and probably quite a few

others want to use  protocol to control jack.
>From Fons :

quoted text> > That being said, I still do favor D-Bus over OSC.

> It's local only, no network support.

Right. Then again, all we need is a better control framework in

libjack and let people develop with whatever protocol they like, be it

OSC, D-Bus, a direct use of the API or smoke signals. I don't

understand why this disagreement goes on while a simple solution on

which everyone could agree has already been brought up.

__________________

Marc-Olivier Barre,

MarcO'Chapeau.

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev