Re: [LAD] LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christian Schoenebeck <cuse@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 9:18 pm

Christian Schoenebeck writes:

> Wrong: http://linuxsampler.org/faq.html#open_source

This is why I don't like the word open source. You can claim that it's
open source just because people can look at the code, which is really
absurd, in my opinion;).

When people talk about free software and open source, it goes really
without saying that they talk about free software as defined by the
FSF and open source as defined by the open source initiative, but
obviously not in your case.

You just say:

- "Here, look at it"

..and then say, well, you looked at it, ergo, it's open source.

The term didn't even exist before the OSI definition.

In my opinion, you are misleading people, straight up.

--
Esben Stien is b0ef@e s a
http://www. s t n m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
sip:b0ef@ e e
jid:b0ef@ n n
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Tue Jan 22, 11:49 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 1:41 pm)
[LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 2:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 2:58 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 8:26 pm)
Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thoug..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Sat Jan 26, 2:15 am)
Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thoug..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Tue Jan 29, 9:42 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Esben Stien, (Thu Jan 24, 9:18 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 7:42 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Krzysztof Foltman, (Thu Jan 24, 7:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 9:04 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Krzysztof Foltman, (Thu Jan 24, 10:29 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 3:13 pm)
[LAD] LV2 adoption, Krzysztof Foltman, (Wed Jan 23, 10:12 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 2:35 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Wed Jan 23, 2:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Fri Jan 25, 6:47 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Wed Jan 23, 10:21 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Jan 23, 9:12 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Thu Jan 24, 12:06 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Thu Jan 24, 9:16 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Fri Jan 25, 8:22 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Jan 23, 10:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Pieter Palmers, (Wed Jan 23, 11:45 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 2:38 pm)