Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 9:16 pm

On Jan 24, 2008 1:06 PM, Steve Harris wrote:

Yup, you missed my last mail :-p

BTW, I never tested Demolition, but I imagine that since it's an
LADSPA host, would it be interesting to use JACK demolition +
Demolition in conjunction ? Or for a more preset matter, write some
LV2 Demolition and use it with jacknuke (to be also able to feed some
midi "noise") ?

The more I think about it, the more I would like the idea to have/work
on a testing framework. One thing that made me very sad is not being
able to use TAP plugins because of some nasty crashes (even though
they sound very good to me). If some testing had been possible at the
time of their writing, I guess some of those issues could have been
spotted/reproduced easily. Nothing is lost though. I just don't feel
like getting in that kind of code right now :-p
__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
MarcO'Chapeau.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Tue Jan 22, 11:49 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 1:41 pm)
[LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 2:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 2:58 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 8:26 pm)
Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thoug..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Sat Jan 26, 2:15 am)
Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thoug..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Tue Jan 29, 9:42 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 7:42 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Krzysztof Foltman, (Thu Jan 24, 7:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 9:04 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Krzysztof Foltman, (Thu Jan 24, 10:29 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 3:13 pm)
[LAD] LV2 adoption, Krzysztof Foltman, (Wed Jan 23, 10:12 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 2:35 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Wed Jan 23, 2:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Fri Jan 25, 6:47 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Wed Jan 23, 10:21 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Jan 23, 9:12 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Thu Jan 24, 12:06 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Thu Jan 24, 9:16 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Fri Jan 25, 8:22 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Jan 23, 10:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Pieter Palmers, (Wed Jan 23, 11:45 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 2:38 pm)