Re: [LAD] LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: alex stone <compose59@...>
Cc: Arnold Krille <arnold@...>, <Linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 6:25 pm

"alex stone" writes:

> we just want to avoid somebody to directly make money with our work,

But that's really the funny thing here. Your software isn't from the
free/open source software communities. It doesn't conform to neither
the free software definition nor the open source definition.

I'm glad that GPLv3 fixes this issue, cause if you state that the
software is under GPLv3 you may not impose any further restrictions on
the work, if I read the license correctly.

--
Esben Stien is b0ef@e s a
http://www. s t n m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
sip:b0ef@ e e
jid:b0ef@ n n
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Tue Jan 22, 11:49 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 1:41 pm)
[LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 2:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 2:58 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Esben Stien, (Thu Jan 24, 6:25 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 8:26 pm)
Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thoug..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Sat Jan 26, 2:15 am)
Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thoug..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Tue Jan 29, 9:42 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 7:42 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Krzysztof Foltman, (Thu Jan 24, 7:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 9:04 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Krzysztof Foltman, (Thu Jan 24, 10:29 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 3:13 pm)
[LAD] LV2 adoption, Krzysztof Foltman, (Wed Jan 23, 10:12 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 2:35 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Wed Jan 23, 2:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Fri Jan 25, 6:47 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Wed Jan 23, 10:21 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Jan 23, 9:12 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Thu Jan 24, 12:06 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Thu Jan 24, 9:16 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Fri Jan 25, 8:22 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Jan 23, 10:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Pieter Palmers, (Wed Jan 23, 11:45 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 2:38 pm)