Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption | Linuxaudio.org

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Marc-Olivier Barre <mobarre@...>

To: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List <linux-audio-dev@...>

Subject: Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption

Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 10:56 pm

On Jan 23, 2008 10:12 PM, Marc-Olivier Barre wrote:

quoted text

> On Jan 23, 2008 11:20 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> > Hah, you're right, though there are some people who have a knack for,
> > and get a kick out of writing conformance tools.
> >
> > Like Nick Lamb, who wrote Demolition for LADSPA: http://devel.tlrmx.org/audio/demolition/
>
> I had intended to make a fork of that a few months adding also some
> jackmidi testing/torture features. jacknuke is the name.
> I still plan on implementing more stuff to make it some sort of more
> robust/featured test application. At the time I felt that Jack
> demolition was a good initiative that needed to be pushed further.
> https://gna.org/projects/jacknuke
>
> It was my first jack clients, my first svn commits... I'd really love
> to revive it. And I already know it can find bugs -> I managed to
> crash a few lv2 synths with it :-p

My bad, jack_nuke is not based on the lv2 demolition but on jack
demolition from Steve Harris :-p
__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
MarcO'Chapeau.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., , (Tue Jan 22, 12:15 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Pieter Palmers, (Tue Jan 22, 12:50 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Steve Harris, (Tue Jan 22, 1:01 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Dave Phillips, (Tue Jan 22, 12:50 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Jan 22, 11:23 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 12:09 am)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., pete shorthose, (Wed Jan 23, 12:02 am)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Dave Robillard, (Tue Jan 22, 4:45 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Benno Senoner, (Tue Jan 22, 2:18 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Dave Robillard, (Tue Jan 22, 5:14 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Thorsten Wilms, (Tue Jan 22, 5:11 pm)

Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Tue Jan 22, 11:49 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Steve Harris, (Wed Jan 23, 10:00 am)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 2:41 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Benno Senoner, (Wed Jan 23, 9:56 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Esben Stien, (Thu Jan 24, 1:12 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Jan 24, 1:31 pm)

Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 1:41 pm)

[LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 2:46 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Paul Davis, (Thu Jan 24, 2:27 pm)

Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 2:58 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., alex stone, (Thu Jan 24, 3:14 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Esben Stien, (Thu Jan 24, 6:25 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Fons Adriaensen, (Fri Jan 25, 3:21 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Dave Robillard, (Fri Jan 25, 6:53 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Jan 28, 1:15 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Dave Robillard, (Mon Jan 28, 10:42 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Fons Adriaensen, (Tue Jan 29, 12:54 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., , (Mon Jan 28, 1:33 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Jan 29, 3:51 am)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Dave Robillard, (Mon Jan 28, 10:57 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 8:26 pm)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., Dave Robillard, (Sat Jan 26, 1:06 am)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Sat Jan 26, 2:15 am)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., Dave Robillard, (Tue Jan 29, 6:25 am)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., pete shorthose, (Tue Jan 29, 2:01 pm)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., Dave Robillard, (Tue Jan 29, 5:16 pm)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., pete shorthose, (Tue Jan 29, 6:22 pm)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., Dave Robillard, (Tue Jan 29, 6:44 pm)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., pete shorthose, (Tue Jan 29, 7:30 pm)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., Dave Robillard, (Tue Jan 29, 4:32 pm)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., pete shorthose, (Tue Jan 29, 4:47 pm)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Tue Jan 29, 9:42 am)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., Dave Robillard, (Tue Jan 29, 5:16 pm)

Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &quot; isn't well thoug..., Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Jan 29, 10:08 am)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Esben Stien, (Thu Jan 24, 9:18 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 10:13 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Pieter Palmers, (Fri Jan 25, 7:53 am)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Thorsten Wilms, (Thu Jan 24, 7:06 pm)

Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 7:42 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Dave Robillard, (Fri Jan 25, 7:02 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Paul Davis, (Thu Jan 24, 6:41 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Krzysztof Foltman, (Thu Jan 24, 7:03 pm)

Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 9:04 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Krzysztof Foltman, (Thu Jan 24, 10:29 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Pieter Palmers, (Fri Jan 25, 7:37 am)

Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 3:13 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 &quot; isn't well thought out ?&quot; ..., Benno Senoner, (Thu Jan 24, 3:12 pm)

[LAD] LV2 adoption, Krzysztof Foltman, (Wed Jan 23, 10:12 am)

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 2:35 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Wed Jan 23, 2:51 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Fri Jan 25, 6:47 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Wed Jan 23, 10:21 am)

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Jan 23, 9:12 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Thu Jan 24, 12:06 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Thu Jan 24, 9:16 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Fri Jan 25, 8:22 am)

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Jan 23, 10:56 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Pieter Palmers, (Wed Jan 23, 11:45 am)

Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 2:38 pm)