Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 9:12 pm

On Jan 23, 2008 11:20 AM, Steve Harris wrote:

I had intended to make a fork of that a few months adding also some
jackmidi testing/torture features. jacknuke is the name.
I still plan on implementing more stuff to make it some sort of more
robust/featured test application. At the time I felt that Jack
demolition was a good initiative that needed to be pushed further.
https://gna.org/projects/jacknuke

It was my first jack clients, my first svn commits... I'd really love
to revive it. And I already know it can find bugs -> I managed to
crash a few lv2 synths with it :-p

> I don't think anyone ever wrote a set up conformance plugins for

This would also be an interesting project. If only humans didn't need
to get some sleep once in a while...
__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
MarcO'Chapeau.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Tue Jan 22, 11:49 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 1:41 pm)
[LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 2:46 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 2:58 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 8:26 pm)
Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thoug..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Sat Jan 26, 2:15 am)
Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thoug..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Tue Jan 29, 9:42 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 7:42 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Krzysztof Foltman, (Thu Jan 24, 7:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Arnold Krille, (Thu Jan 24, 9:04 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 &amp;quot; isn't well thought out ?&amp;quot; ..., Krzysztof Foltman, (Thu Jan 24, 10:29 pm)
Re: [LAD] , Christian Schoenebeck, (Thu Jan 24, 3:13 pm)
[LAD] LV2 adoption, Krzysztof Foltman, (Wed Jan 23, 10:12 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 2:35 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Wed Jan 23, 2:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Fri Jan 25, 6:47 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Wed Jan 23, 10:21 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Jan 23, 9:12 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Thu Jan 24, 12:06 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Thu Jan 24, 9:16 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Steve Harris, (Fri Jan 25, 8:22 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Jan 23, 10:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Pieter Palmers, (Wed Jan 23, 11:45 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption, Dave Robillard, (Wed Jan 23, 2:38 pm)