Re: [LAD] Re: Direct Stream Digital / Pulse Density

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Friday, September 28, 2007 - 4:03 am

Gordon JC Pearce sez:

>

That's pretty freaking funny. Reminds me of the Penn and Teller where
they sell the diners in a trendy restaurant water from a garden hose
on the patio. haha http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfPAjUvvnIc it's
really funny stuff; worth watching if you have a couple minutes.

Incidentally, I get my water from a mountain spring up the road (can't
do much better than that, eh?), although I *have* bought a bottle of
two of Evian in my day :)

As for the double blind audio test, I reckon you guys have all seen
the new AES journal by now (if not, go to your mailbox). There is a
double-blind test where people were played DVD-A and SACD's, but some
of them were passed through an extra A/D/A stage at 16bit-44.1khz.
There was something like a 50% success rate in choosing the audio
source correctly.

Maybe it *is* all in my head...?

Although, I wonder if ear training has anything to do with it. I'm
super dorky sometimes, and I used to mix multitrack projects to
different bit-depths/sample-rates and then try to train myself to hear
the differences between them. hahaha, I figure most people don't do
that sort of thing...

~Maitland

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] Re: Direct Stream Digital / Pulse Density, Maitland Vaughan-Turner, (Fri Sep 28, 4:03 am)
Re: [LAD] Re: Direct Stream Digital / Pulse Density, Fons Adriaensen, (Fri Sep 28, 8:07 am)