On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:32 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
I think you're missing the point. Current CVS LS *IS* effectively
If a company wanted to use recent CVS LS in a commercial product right
now, and did, there's no way you'd be able to do anything about it.
There's a bunch of files in CVS that say right in them they're GPLed,
and they point to a COPYING file which is the GPL, verbatim. There's
not a lawyer in the world that would say a vague webpage disclaimer or
README file (neither of which you actually need to see to get at the
source code) overrides that.
>From the sounds of it whatever company caused this isn't very friendly..
would you put it past them? You think you're covering your ass but
you're not wearing any pants ;)
> I strongly believe (although I'm also speculating here;) the next public