Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Saturday, July 1, 2006 - 10:42 pm

On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 04:09:42PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:

> Whether or not you agree with the licensing practise, calling it "open

If the source is available for everyone to read, then it is open
according to the normal meaning of those words in English. What is
misleading is to attach any other meaning to them. It's a typical
marketeer's trick to redefine words or concepts that have a clear
an established meaning, and IMHO that's a disgusting practice.

Besides that, DR is broadcasting plain lies. There is nothing in
the Linuxsampler licence nor in that infamouse README that should
impede you using it for an album or concert you sell commercially.

--
FA

Follie! Follie! Delirio vano e' questo!

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Forest Bond, (Fri Jun 30, 1:55 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Luis Garrido, (Fri Jun 30, 2:03 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Forest Bond, (Fri Jun 30, 2:25 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Robert Ham, (Fri Jun 30, 2:55 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Dave Robillard, (Sat Jul 1, 2:42 pm)
[linux-audio-dev] Re: fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Loki Davison, (Mon Jul 3, 1:23 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Forest Bond, (Tue Jul 4, 6:18 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Tue Jul 4, 8:22 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Forest Bond, (Mon Jul 3, 12:27 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Jan Weil, (Mon Jul 3, 12:35 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Luis Garrido, (Sat Jul 1, 3:43 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Dave Robillard, (Sat Jul 1, 4:34 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Jul 1, 4:54 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Bob Ham, (Sat Jul 1, 7:33 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Dave Robillard, (Sat Jul 1, 7:51 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Sun Jul 2, 5:28 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Dave Robillard, (Sun Jul 2, 5:48 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Lars Luthman, (Sat Jul 1, 5:22 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Jul 1, 5:42 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sat Jul 1, 7:57 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Sun Jul 2, 9:27 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Rui Nuno Capela, (Sun Jul 2, 11:37 am)
Re: LinuxSampler license, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST..., Marc-Olivier Barre, (Tue Jul 4, 4:41 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Dave Robillard, (Sat Jul 1, 8:09 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Fons Adriaensen, (Sat Jul 1, 10:42 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Thorsten Wilms, (Sun Jul 2, 8:50 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Jul 2, 10:52 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Ryan Heise, (Sun Jul 2, 3:47 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Lars Luthman, (Sat Jul 1, 11:45 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Dave Robillard, (Sat Jul 1, 11:44 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Dave Robillard, (Sat Jul 1, 6:59 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Luis Garrido, (Sat Jul 1, 9:17 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Lee Revell, (Sat Jul 1, 4:22 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Lars Luthman, (Sat Jul 1, 4:09 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] fst, VST 2.0, kontakt, Luis Garrido, (Fri Jun 30, 2:53 pm)