Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: <nettings@...>
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 - 2:27 pm

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Paul Winkler wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:57:12PM +0200, ?rjan Askhult wrote:

as a sidenote, paul, when you change the config, make sure the subscriber
list remains protected from public view.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Paul Winkler, (Thu Aug 14, 7:28 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Alfons Adriaensen, (Thu Aug 14, 2:28 pm)
Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sho..., , (Tue Aug 19, 2:27 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, John Littler, (Thu Aug 14, 7:59 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Axel Müller, (Thu Aug 14, 11:40 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Luke Yelavich, (Thu Aug 14, 8:15 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Robert Jonsson, (Thu Aug 14, 7:50 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Jack O'Quin, (Thu Aug 14, 1:04 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Tarragon Allen, (Thu Aug 14, 8:01 am)